Gotell v. Ridgeway

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE; this action is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and all parties for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/27/07. (kaj)

Download PDF
Gotell v. Ridgeway Doc. 5 Case 3:07-cv-00084-LAB-JMA Document 5 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vs. 13 KIMMI RIDGEWAY, Deputy Clerk, et al., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HO N O R A B LE LARRY ALAN BURNS United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH GOTELL, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 07cv0084-LAB (JMA) ORDER DISMISSING CASE Defendants. By Order entered February 1, 2007, this court granted plaintiff's Motion To Proceed IFP, dismissed the Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) after sua sponte screening, and granted plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint to address all the deficiencies of pleading described in that Order. The court further advised plaintiff that if the First Amended Complaint still failed to state a claim, this case would be dismissed with prejudice, without further leave to amend. See McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 1996). On February 13, 2007, plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint. However, that pleading fails to cure the defects identified in his original pleading. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all claims and all parties for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 27, 2007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?