Pacific Law Center et al v. Saadat-Nejad

Filing 31

Discrepancy Order by Judge Larry Alan Burns rejecting document: Response & Oppose Default & Motion from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule 5.1; other: no indication of ex parte request for relief from default or showing why dft is purportedly not in default; the exhibits are irrelevant to the default issue; argument regarding detail or merits of other cases is irrelevant to the default issue in this case; extraneous argument fails to show good cause for relief from the default; no motion to dismiss hearing was requested and none will be granted while defendant remains in default; the document is rejected, the clerk is ordered to strike the document from the record; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 5/15/07. (kaj)

Pacific Law Center et al v. Saadat-Nejad

Doc. 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 07cv0460 TITLE: Pacific Law v. Saadat-Nejad E-FILED DATE: DOCKET NO.: 30 DOCUMENT TITLE: Response & Oppose Default & Motion DOCUMENT FILED BY: Defendant pro se Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x C i v i l Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing A d m i n i s t r a t iv e Policies and P r o c e d u re s Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) X Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 X

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: No indication of ex parte request for relief from default or showing why defendant is purportedly not in default; the exhibits are irrelevant to the default issue; argument regarding detail or merits of other cases is irrelevant to the default issue in this case; extraneous argument fails to show good cause for relief from the default; no motion to dismiss hearing was requested and none will be granted while defendant remains in default.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. X The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: May 15, 2007 HO N O R A B L E LARRY ALAN BURNS Unit ed States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com