Payne et al v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 45

ORDER denying 42 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file responsive pleadingwithout prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/08/07. (jpp, )

Payne et al v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al

Doc. 45

Case 3:07-cv-00705-JAH-CAB

Document 45

Filed 06/11/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs and defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company have filed a joint motion for an extension of time for defendant to file a responsive pleading in this case. However, prior to this Court's ruling on that motion, this Court granted defendant Menu Foods, Inc. motion for a stay of all proceedings pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("MDL Panel") on transfer. See Doc. # 43. This Court, therefore, finds the joint motion for extension of time moot. // // //
07cv0705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT PAYNE and STEVE BARTILUCCI, v. Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No.07CV0705 JAH(CAB) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT [DOC. # 42]

MENU FOODS, INC., a New Jersey corporation, PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, SAFEWAY, INC., a Delaware corporation, THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, a Ohio corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00705-JAH-CAB

Document 45

Filed 06/11/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the joint motion for extension of time for defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company to file a responsive pleading [doc. # 42] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.

DATED: June 8, 2007

HON. JOHN A. HOUSTON United States District Judge

2

07cv0705