Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying [29} Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file responsive pleading without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/08/07. (jpp, )

Download PDF
Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al Doc. 32 Case 3:07-cv-00706-JAH-CAB Document 32 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HON. JOHN A. HOUSTON United States District Judge 07cv0706 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIANE SWARBERG, individually and ) on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) MENU FOODS HOLDING, INC., ) THE IAMS COMPANY and DOES 1 ) through 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil No.07CV0706 JAH(CAB) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT [DOC. # 29] Plaintiffs and defendant The Iams Company have filed a joint motion for an extension of time for defendant to file a responsive pleading in this case. However, prior to this Court's ruling on that motion, this Court granted defendant Menu Foods Holding, Inc. motion for a stay of all proceedings pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("MDL Panel") on transfer. See Doc. # 30. This Court, therefore, finds the joint motion for extension of time moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the joint motion for extension of time for defendant The Proctor & Gamble Company to file a responsive pleading [doc. # 29] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Dated: June 8, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?