Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al

Filing 33

ORDER denying 31 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file responsive pleading without prejudice without prejudice as moot.Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 06/22/07. (jpp)

Download PDF
Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al Doc. 33 Case 3:07-cv-00706-JAH-CAB Document 33 Filed 06/22/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIANE SWARBERG, individually and ) on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) MENU FOODS HOLDING, INC., ) THE IAMS COMPANY and DOES 1 ) through 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil No.07CV0706 JAH(CAB) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT [DOC. # 31] Plaintiff and defendant Menu Foods Holdings, Inc. have filed a joint motion for an extension of time for defendant to file a responsive pleading in this case. However, just prior to the filing of the joint motion, this Court granted defendant Menu Foods Holding, Inc.'s motion for a stay of all proceedings pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("MDL Panel") on transfer. See Doc. # 30. This Court, therefore, finds the joint motion for extension of time moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the joint motion for extension of time for defendant Menu Foods Holding, Inc. to file a responsive pleading [doc. # 31] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Dated: June 22, 2007 HON. JOHN A. HOUSTON United States District Judge 07cv0706 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?