Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al

Filing 9

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to File Responsive Pleading and Proof of Service by Menu Foods Holding Inc. (Hack, Susan)

Download PDF
Swarberg v. Menu Foods Holding Inc et al Doc. 9 Case 3:07-cv-00706-BTM-POR Document 9 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N DI E G O SUSAN M. HACK, ESQ. (Bar No. 145347) STEPHEN T. PELLETIER, ESQ. (Bar No. 231236) HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP 401 West A Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101-7913 TEL: 619.236.1551 FAX: 619.696.1410 Attorneys for Defendant MENU FOODS HOLDING, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIANE SWARBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MENU FOODS HOLDING, INC., THE IAMS COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 07cv0706 BTM (POR) JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz Courtroom: 15 Pursuant to CivLR 12.1 of the Local Rules of Practice for United States District Court, Southern District of California, Defendant MENU FOODS HOLDINGS, INC., hereinafter referred to as "MENU FOODS" and Plaintiff DIANE SWARBERG ("Plaintiff"), hereby jointly move for an order extending the time for Defendant MENU FOODS to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties jointly request that the deadline for filing Defendant's First Responsive pleading be extended from April 27, 2007 to June 11, 2007. /// /// /// /// 803517.1 07 CV 0706 BTM (POR) Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00706-BTM-POR Document 9 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N DI E G O Good cause exists for granting an extension. Defendant has just retained counsel, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack LLP, and counsel needs time to review the facts and allegations in order to prepare a proper response. The case was only recently removed from State to Federal Court on April 18, 2007, by Defendant MENU FOODS, and is a class action involving multiple parties. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: April 27, 2007 HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP By:s/Stephen T. Pelletier SUSAN M. HACK, ESQ. STEPHEN T. PELLETIER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant MENU FOODS DATED: April 27, 2007 BERDING & WEIL, LLP By:s/Jeffrey B. Cereghino JEFFREY B. CEREGHINO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff DIANE SWARBERG 803517.1 2 07 CV 0706 BTM (POR) Case 3:07-cv-00706-BTM-POR Document 9 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N DI E G O ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________ _________________________________________ The Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 803517.1 3 07 CV 0706 BTM (POR) Case 3:07-cv-00706-BTM-POR Document 9 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HIGGS, FLETCHER & MACK LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N DI E G O CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on April 27, 2007, I caused the following document: JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF. I further certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing document and the notice of electronic mailing to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following non-ECF participants: Jeffrey B Cereghino Berding and Weil 3240 Stone Valley Road West Alamo, CA 94507 (925)838-2090 Fax: (925)820-5592 Don Howarth Howarth and Smith 523 West Sixth Street Suite 728 Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213)955-9400 Email: dhowarth@howarth-smith.com Date: April 27, 2007 s/Marianne Boyles 803517.1 4 07 CV 0706 BTM (POR)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?