Corothers v. Evans

Filing 11

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and reopening case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 06/25/07. (joeh)

Download PDF
Corothers v. Evans Doc. 11 Case 3:07-cv-00823-WQH-CAB Document 11 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M. EVANS, Warden, Respondent. v. DONTE LEON COROTHERS, Petitioner, Civil No. 07-0823 WQH (CAB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REOPENING CASE On May 7, 2007, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On May 14, 2007, this Court dismissed the petition for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Petitioner was notified that, in order to have his case reopened, he had to either (1) pay the filing fee or (2) provide adequate proof of his inability to pay, no later than July 9, 2007. On June 18, 2007, Petitioner filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. According to his trust account statement, Petitioner has no funds on account at the California correctional institution in which he is presently confined. Petitioner cannot afford the $5.00 filing fee. Thus, the Court GRANTS Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis and ORDERS the case reopened. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 25, 2007 WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge -107cv0823 K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\WQH\07cv0823-ifpgrt.wpd, 6257 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?