Carl Zeiss Vision International GMBH et al v. Signet Armorlite Inc
Filing
1169
INTERIM JUDGMENT. The parties shall file their opening brief in support of their respective post-trial motions on or before June 30, 2011. Opposition briefs shall be filed on or before July 14, 2011, and reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 21, 2011. The motions shall be heard on July 29, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/2/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARL ZEISS VISION INTERNATIONAL
GMBH and CARL ZEISS VISION INC.,,
CASE NO. 07cv0894 DMS (POR)
INTERIM JUDGMENT
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
SIGNET ARMORLITE, INC.,
15
Defendant.
____________________________________
16
AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
17
18
Pursuant to Rules 54(b) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court enters
19
interim judgment as described herein. This interim judgment is entered further to the jury verdict
20
returned on June 15, 2010, and May 18, 2011, and in accordance with the Court’s January 15, 2010
21
order granting summary judgment, June 7, 2010 ruling granting judgment as a matter of law,
22
September 13, 2010 order granting judgment as a matter of law, and November 8, 2010 order granting
23
judgment as a matter of law.
24
1.
25
invalid.
26
2.
27
equivalents and invalid as anticipated and obvious.
28
///
Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713 is adjudged literally and willfully infringed and not
Claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713 is adjudged willfully infringed under the doctrine of
-1-
07cv0894
1
3.
Claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713 is adjudged literally and willfully infringed and not
2
invalid.
3
4.
4
anticipated, obvious and not enabled.
5
5.
Claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713 is adjudged valid.
6
6.
Signet did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that claims 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of U.S.
7
Patent No. 6,089,713 are invalid for indefiniteness or lack of written description.
8
7.
9
Zeiss Vision GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc., Carl Zeiss
Claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,713 is adjudged not willfully infringed and invalid as
On Signet’s counterclaim for federal unfair competition, judgment is entered in favor of Carl
10
Stiftung and Carl Zeiss AG.
11
8.
12
of Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc., Carl Zeiss
13
Stiftung and Carl Zeiss AG.
14
9.
15
favor of Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc., Carl
16
Zeiss Stiftung and Carl Zeiss AG.
17
10.
18
favor of Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc., Carl
19
Zeiss Stiftung and Carl Zeiss AG.
20
11.
21
Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc., Carl Zeiss
22
Stiftung and Carl Zeiss AG.
23
12.
24
conduct and unfair competition under California Business and Professions Code § 17200, the Court
25
declines to enter judgment on the damages verdict at this time.
26
13.
27
///
28
///
On Signet’s counterclaim for common law unfair competition, judgment is entered in favor
On Signet’s counterclaim for interference with contractual relations, judgment is entered in
On Signet’s counterclaim for interference with prospective advantage, judgment is entered in
On Signet’s counterclaim for violation of the antitrust laws, judgment is entered in favor of
In anticipation of the parties’ post-trial motion and resolution of the issues of inequitable
The parties shall file their opening brief in support of their respective post-trial motions on or
-2-
07cv0894
1
before June 30, 2011. Opposition briefs shall be filed on or before July 14, 2011, and reply briefs
2
shall be filed on or before July 21, 2011. The motions shall be heard on July 29, 2011, at 1:30 p.m.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 2, 2011
5
6
HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
07cv0894
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?