Smith v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 32

ORDER re petitioner's letter 31 . Petitioner's objection to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is due no later than February18, 2009. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 1/20/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CORY LANCELIN SMITH, Petitioner, vs. A. HEDGPETH, Warden (KVSPDelano II); EDMUND G. BROWN, Attorney General of State of CA, Respondents. On January 8, 2009, Petitioner submitted a letter requesting information on what action he should take in light of the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. (Doc. No. 31.) Objections to the report and recommendation were due August 13, 2008. (Doc. No. 30.) The Court grants Petitioner an extension of time in which to file any objection. Petitioner's objection to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is due no later than February 18, 2009. The Court declines any further extensions after February 18, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 20, 2009 ________________________________ MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 07-CV-1339 H (PCL) ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER'S LETTER 07cv1339

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?