Araiza v. San Diego City Of et al

Filing 51

ORDER denying 50 joint Motion to Continue hearing date of motion for summary judgment or in the alternative partial summary judgment without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 2/5/09. Modified on 2/5/2009 to edit text (tkl).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge -107cv1921

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SERGIO ARAIZA, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Doc. No. 50

CITY OF SAN DIEGO and KELENE MUNRO, Defendants.

Plaintiff initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 1, 2007. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment on November 21, 2008. (Doc. No. 41.) The date set for hearing on this matter was continued to February 20, 2009 following the parties' joint stipulation. (Doc. No. 46.) Pending before the court is the parties' second request to continue the hearing date. However, the parties have presented no circumstances to the court which would warrant a finding of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Therefore, the joint motion to continue the hearing date (Doc. No. 50) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 5, 2009