Araiza v. San Diego City Of et al
Filing
55
ORDER granting 52 joint Motion for dismissal in its entirety as to Defendant City of San Diego only. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 2/6/09. (tkl)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1The parties having so stipulated, it is ORDERED that the Fifth Amended Complaint for Damages, filed August 11, 2008 (Doc. No. 31-2), be dismissed in its entirety as to Defendant City of San Diego only. Both Plaintiff and Defendant City of San Diego are to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 6, 2009 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge SERGIO ARAIZA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc) ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL Doc. No. 52
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, KELENE MUNRO, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
07cv1921
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
