Bailey v. State of California Department of Justice et al

Filing 49

CLERK'S JUDGMENT IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED - the ex parte application to amend motion to strike is denied as moot. As all claims have been resolved in this action, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (kaj).

AO 450 Judgment in a Civil Case

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSO BAILEY V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; ALLEN J. PRECKEL; CITY OF EL CAJON; M. BEVAN; SAN DIEGO COUNTY; DONNIE DUMANUS; WILLIAM KOLENDER

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NUMBER:

07cv2090-JM(BLM)

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the ex parte application to amend motion to strike is denied as moot. As all claims have been

resolved in this action, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................
August 6, 2009 Date S/ T. Lee (By) Deputy Clerk ENTERED ON August 6, 2009

W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Clerk

07cv2090-JM(BLM)