Milo v. Fullner et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/30/07. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed IFP 2 is denied.This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for failure to suc cessfully move to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).Plaintiff if granted forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with aCourt-approved form Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP". Form mailed to plaintiff 11/30/07.(tkl)

Milo v. Fullner et al

Doc. 3

Case 3:07-cv-02255-JM-PCL

Document 3

Filed 11/30/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEMANU MILO, CDCR #P-78110, Plaintiff, vs. KEVIN FULLNER, et al., Defendants.

Civil No.

07-2255 JM (PCL)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2]

Semanu Milo ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison located in Soledad, California, and proceeding pro se, has submitted a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2]. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP Effective April 9, 2006, all parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\FM PRO SE - HABEAS\11 30 1007\07cv2255_deny IFP_11 30 2007.wpd

-1-

07cv2255

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-02255-JM-PCL

Document 3

Filed 11/30/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

§ 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Prisoners granted leave to proceed IFP however, remain obligated to pay the entire fee in installments, regardless of whether the action is ultimately dismissed for any reason. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2). Prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also submit a "certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint...." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); see also Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 850 (9th Cir. 2002). Thereafter, the institution having custody of the prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), he has not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners "seeking to bring a civil action ...without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). Without Plaintiff's trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the appropriate amount of the filing fee required to initiate this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP must be DENIED. II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED.
-207cv2255

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\FM PRO SE - HABEAS\11 30 1007\07cv2255_deny IFP_11 30 2007.wpd

Case 3:07-cv-02255-JM-PCL

Document 3

Filed 11/30/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(2)

This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing

fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for failure to successfully move to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (3) Plaintiff if GRANTED forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to

either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a Court-approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $350 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court. DATED: November 30, 2007 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\FM PRO SE - HABEAS\11 30 1007\07cv2255_deny IFP_11 30 2007.wpd

-3-

07cv2255