Brooks v. Clark et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting 4 Petitioner's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/17/08. (tkl)

Download PDF
Brooks v. Clark et al Doc. 6 Case 3:08-cv-00125-JM-BLM Document 6 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Copies to: ALL PARTIES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERNEST J. BROOKS, III, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, et al., Respondents. Civil No. 08cv0125-JM (BLM) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS On January 22, 2008, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Petitioner has now filed a Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 4.) Petitioner has no funds on account at the California correctional institution in which he is presently confined. Petitioner cannot afford the $5.00 filing fee. Thus, the Court GRANTS Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, and allows Petitioner to prosecute the above-referenced action as a poor person without being required to prepay fees or costs and without being required to post security. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 17, 2008 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\3 17 2008\08cv0125_GrantIFP_3 17 2008.wpd, 3178 -1- 08cv0125 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?