Presidio Components Inc v. American Technical Ceramics Corp

Filing 198

ORDER denying American Technical Ceramics Corp's 185 Argument Regarding Proposed Additional Admitted and Uncontested Facts. Court directs parties to meet and confer regarding any additional admitted and uncontested facts. Parties shall submit any additional stipulations as appropriate, no later than 2 weeks prior to trial. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/6/2009. (jah) (jrl).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC., vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 08cv335 - IEG - NLS ORDER DENYING ATC'S ARGUMENT REGARDING PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ADMITTED AND UNCONTESTED FACTS [Doc. No. 185.] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., Defendant. At the Pretrial Conference, a week after the parties lodged their Proposed Pretrial Order, defendant American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC") submitted under seal an "Argument Regarding Proposed Additional Admitted and Uncontested Facts." (Doc. No. 185.) Presidio submitted an opposition on June 15, 2009. On June 1, 2009, the Court signed and entered the Pretrial Order. As such, ATC's argument is DENIED AS MOOT. Furthermore, the Court directs the parties to meet and confer regarding any additional admitted and uncontested facts. No later than two weeks prior to trial, the parties shall submit any additional stipulations as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 6, 2009 IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge United States District Court -1- 08cv335 - IEG - NLS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?