Clark v. Hernandez

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 04/01/09 (ag) (kaj).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH CLARK, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO. 08-CV-399 H (PCL) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden, Respondent. On March 3, 2008, Petitioner Joseph Clark filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the Board of Parole Hearings' (the "Board") denial of parole on August 10, 2005. Petitioner presents two issues: (1) violation of his federal right to procedural due process by denial of parole based on the facts of his commitment offense; and (2) violation of his federal right to procedural due process by deferring a subsequent parole hearing for three years. On August 6, 2008, Respondent filed an answer to the petition. After reviewing the Petition, Respondent's Answer and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and all supporting documents submitted by the parties, and the //// //// //// //// -108cv399 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and denies the petition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2009 _______________________________ MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Copies to: Linda Mann Buchalter Law Offices of Linda Buchalter 1011 5th Street, Suite 6 Santa Monica , CA 90403 Kimara A Aarons California Department of Justice PO Box 85266 San Diego , CA 92186-5266 -208cv399

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?