Chrisman v. Smith et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 45 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend. Pla may file a Second Amended Complaint no later than 30 days from the date this Order is filed. Defendants' 43 Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is denied as moot, subject to renewal if Pla elects not file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/19/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge United States District Court DATED: August 19, 2009 Ronald Chrisman, vs. David Smith, et al., Defendants. The Court received Plaintiff's letter requesting an extension of time to file his second amended complaint. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request for an extension of time. Plaintiff may file his second amended complaint no later than 30 days from the date this order is filed. The Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint is DENIED AS MOOT, subject to renewal in the event Plaintiff elects not to file a second amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 08cv975-IEG (LSP) Order Granting Extension of Time [Doc. No. 43.]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

08cv975 - IEG (LSP)