Gomez et al v. Millan-Martinez et al

Filing 74

ORDER Re Plaintiffs' Request that Defendants Lodge Deposition Transcripts. Denying 68 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/6/10. (vet)

Download PDF
-CAB Gomez et al v. Millan-Martinez et al Doc. 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge ENEDINO DURAN GOMEZ, et al., v. ROSSI CONCRETE, INC., Defendant. Plaintiffs have filed a request that Defendants lodge the original deposition transcripts of John Lowery and Aryella Stickney with the Court [Doc. 68]. They make their request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(6). That rule says that "[i]f a party offers in evidence only part of a deposition, an adverse party may require the offeror to introduce other parts that in fairness should be considered with the part introduced, and any party may itself introduce any other parts." Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(6). The rule, however, does not support Plaintiffs' request. Plaintiffs are the ones who offered the Lowery and Stickney depositions into evidence. And they are the ones who offered "only part of a deposition." Id. Moreover, the rule does not require entire, original deposition transcripts to be lodged with the Court. If Plaintiffs wanted the Court to consider other parts of the deposition, they should have included those parts in their motion. The request is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 6, 2010 Plaintiff, Case No. 08cv1442 BTM (CAB) ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST THAT DEFENDANTS LODGE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 08cv1442 BTM (CAB) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?