Thames v. Musgrave et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, as detailed in the Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/4/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (kaj).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge -108cv1483 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN FRANKLIN THAMES, vs. N. MUSGRAVE, et al., Defendant. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 08 CV 1483 JM (JMA) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Doc. Nos. 17, 28 On January 12, 2010, Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler entered a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 28). The Report and Recommendation, expressly incorporated herein, thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed Plaintiff's claims and recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17) be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and Defendants filed a reply. (Doc. Nos. 32, 34). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. In his objections, Plaintiff sets forth essentially the same arguments raised in his original petition. As the Report and Recommendation fully and properly responds to these arguments, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, as detailed in the Report and Recommendations. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 4, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?