Securities and Exchange Commission v. Retail Pro, Inc et al
Filing 131
ORDER: The (Doc. 95 ) Motion in Limine by Plaintiff for an Order Specifying that Facts Be Treated as Established and Excluding Contradictory Evidence or Testimony is denied. The (Doc. 98 ) Motion in Limine by Defendant to Exclude Evidence Regarding this Court's Prior Summary Judgment Order is granted. The (Doc. 96 ) Motion in Limine by Plaintiff to Exclude Testimony and Expert Report by Defendant's Expert, Jerry Arnold, is denied without prejudice as to Arnold's testimony and g ranted as to Arnold's report. The (Doc. 97 ) Motion in Limine by Defendant to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony by Plaintiff's Expert Peter Salomon is denied without prejudice. The (Doc. 99 ) Motion in Limine by Defendant to Exclude Evidence of Consent Decrees and Judgments Entered into Between the Plaintiff and Defendants Retail Pro, Inc., Barry M. Schechter and Harvey Braun in Settlement of this Action is granted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/10/2011. (mdc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
