Luevano v. Martel et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice: Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court dismisses the case without prejudice. If Petitioner wishes to p roceed with this case, he must submit, no later than 3/30/2009, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. The Clerk of Court shall send a blank In Forma Pauperis Application to Petitioner along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/29/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; a blank IFP form included in mailing to Petitioner.) (mdc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. M. MARTEL, Warden, et al., Respondents. CHRISTOPHER LUEVANO, Petitioner, Civil No. 09cv0145-WQH (RBB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, but has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he must submit, no later than March 30, 2009, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. The Clerk of Court shall send a blank Southern District of California In Forma Pauperis Application to Petitioner along with a copy of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 29, 2009 WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\WQH\09cv0145-Dismiss.wpd, 1299 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?