Pittman v. Martel et al

Filing 3

CLERK'S JUDGMENT - the Court dismisses this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915 (a). This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl)

Download PDF
AO 450 Judgment in a Civil Case United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILBUR LANN PITTMAN V. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NUMBER: MATTHEW MARTEL, Warden; M. PEARSON, DDP; H. ORNELAS; H. HOWARD, CCI Counselor 09-0527 JM (WMc) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court dismisses this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a). This case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a).......... ......................................................................................................................................................................... April 2, 2009 Date W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr. Clerk S/ T. Lee (By) Deputy Clerk ENTERED ON April 2, 2009 09-0527 JM (WMc)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?