Pena v. Cara Brooks Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan et al
Filing
109
ORDER Granting 107 Joint Motion to Continue Deadline for Expert Witness Report Disclosure Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(A)(2)(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/7/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet)
-AJB Pena v. Cara Brooks Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan et al
Doc. 109
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CATALINA PENA, an individual, v. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No.09cv0720 BTM (AJB)
cal
CARA BROOKS CORPORATION DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN, an entity of unknown form, et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR EXPERT WITNESS REPORT DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 26(A)(2)(B) [Doc. No. 107.]
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the Court, having reviewed and considered the Joint Motion to Continue Deadline For Expert Witness Report Disclosure Pursuant To Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Rule 26(A)(2)(B), hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The date for disclosure of expert witness reports pursuant to Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure
Rule 26(a)(2)(b) originally set for July 9, 2010 will be continued to July 16, 2010. 2. The date for supplementation of the disclosure of expert witness reports with contradictory or
rebuttal evidence pursuant to Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c) originally set for July // // // // 1
09cv0722
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
26, 2010 will be continued to August 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 7, 2010 Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court
K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\2 Orders to be filed\09cv720.pena.wpd
2
09cv0722
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?