Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. v. Home Capital Funding
Filing
44
ORDER: The ex parte application (ECF No. 36 ) is Granted. The hearing date for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s Motion to Amend Judgment (ECF No. 32 ) is continued from 12/03/2018 to 02/11/2019. The briefing schedule on Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s Motion to Amend Judgment (ECF No. 32 ) is amended as follows: Opposition Brief Deadline: 01/28/2019. Reply Brief Deadline: 02/04/2019. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/28/2018. (ajs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS
INC.,
ORDER
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
Case No. 3:09-CV-0859-WQH-BLM
HOME CAPITAL FUNDING,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HAYES, Judge:
The matter before the Court is the Ex Parte Application for an Order
Continuing Hearing and Briefing Schedule on Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s Motion
to Amend Judgment. (ECF No. 36).
I.
Background
On September 10, 2010, this Court entered default judgment against Defendant
Home Capital Funding (“HCF”) in the amount of $2,264,722.44, plus interest. (ECF
No. 18). On November 9, 2010, Defendant HCF filed for chapter seven bankruptcy,
and a Notice of Automatic Stay was filed in this action on November 15, 2010. (ECF
No. 19). On October 25, 2018, Plaintiff Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”)
filed a Motion to Amend Judgment to Add Names of Corporate Successors of Judgment
Debtor. (ECF No. 32). On November 14, 2018, Non-Parties Ditech Financial LLC,
1
1 Security One Lending, and Ditech Mortgage Group (“the Ditech Non-Parties”) filed an
2 Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Hearing and Briefing Schedule on
3 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s Motion to Amend Judgment. (ECF No. 36). On
4 November 16, 2018, Plaintiff Lehman filed an Opposition. (ECF No. 42).
5
6
II.
Contentions of the Parties
The Ditech Non-Parties request that the Court continue the hearing date on
7 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment from December 3, 2018 to February 11, 2019.
8 The Ditech Non-Parties assert that a continuance is necessary to ensure that the briefing
9 on Plaintiff’s Motion “is based on a full and complete record,” since the parties are
10 currently engaged in discovery in a New York bankruptcy court on the same successor
11 liability question raised by Plaintiff’s Motion. (ECF No. 36 at 3). Additionally, the
12 Ditech Non-Parties contend that independent of the ongoing discovery in New York,
13 Plaintiff’s Motion “raises a host of additional factual disputes and legal issues into
14 which investigation and discovery is self-evidently necessary.” (ECF No. 36-1 at 8).
15 The Ditech Non-Parties assert that “the Ditech Non-Parties would suffer irreparable
16 harm if this motion was heard according to regularly noticed motion procedures.” (ECF
17 No. 36 at 3).
18
Plaintiff contends that the continuance is not necessary because “it is only
19 Lehman that will benefit from any further discovery in New York, not Ditech, and
20 Lehman is content to move forward with its Motion to Amend nonetheless.” (ECF No.
21 42 at 2) (emphasis omitted). Plaintiff further contends that “potential prejudice caused
22 by further delay is only exacerbated by Ditech’s self-proclaimed and acknowledged
23 weakening financial condition, as evidenced by having been ejected from the New York
24 Stock Exchange.” Id. at 7.
25
26
III.
Ruling of the Court
Before the original time or its extension expires, the Court may extend time for a
27 party to file a responsive document upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P.
28
2
1 6(b)(1)(A). In this case, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
2 that:
3
1.
The ex parte application (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED.
4
2.
The hearing date for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s Motion to Amend
5 Judgment (ECF No. 32) is continued from December 3, 2018 to February 11, 2019.
6
3.
The briefing schedule on Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s Motion to
7 Amend Judgment (ECF No. 32) is amended as follows:
8
a.
Opposition Brief Deadline: January 28, 2019
9
b.
Reply Brief Deadline: February 4, 2019
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated: November 28, 2018
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?