McIver v. Pacific Carmel Mountain Holdings, LP et al

Filing 91

ORDER granting 85 Motion to Amend/Correct Amended Pleadings due by 4/22/2011.The hearing on calendar for 4/25/2011 is vacated. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/18/11. (rlu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY McIVER, CASE NO. 09CV1975-LAB (AJB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; AND vs. 13 ORDER VACATING HEARING 14 15 PACIFIC CARMEL MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, LP, et al. Defendants. 16 17 18 On March 2, Plaintiff moved for leave to amend his complaint to include elements 19 required by Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., 631 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2011). This 20 motion was set for hearing on Monday, April 25, 2011. Under Civil Local rule 7.1(e)(2), the 21 oppositions of the two remaining Defendants, Sears, Roebuck & Co., and Costco Wholesale 22 Corporation, were therefore due no later than Monday, April 11, 2011. 23 On March 29, Sears filed a notice of non-opposition. Costco filed no opposition or 24 notice of non-opposition, though a joint motion to which it was a signatory suggested that 25 amendment was expected. (Joint Mot. to Continue Pretrial Deadlines, Docket no. 87, at 26 2:22–26.) Under Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(3)(c), failure to file an opposition as required under 27 Rule7.1(e)(2) may constitute consent to the granting of the motion. The Court so construes 28 /// -1- 09CV1975 1 Costco’s failure to oppose the motion, which is therefore GRANTED. No later than April 22, 2 2011, Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint. 3 The hearing on calendar for Monday, April 25 is VACATED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: April 18, 2011 6 7 HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 09CV1975

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?