Olea v. San Diego County Sheriff

Filing 3

ORDER Denying 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice: Plaintiff if granted forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to either: (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to P roceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/4/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, Blank Motion for IFP sent to Plaintiff with copy of Order)(pdc) (kaj).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 D e f e n d a n ts . 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H e rm e lin d o Olea ("Plaintiff"), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan C o rre c tio n a l Facility located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has submitted a c iv il rights Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing f e e mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma P a u p e ris ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2]. /// /// /// S A N DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., vs. H E R M E L IN D O OLEA, C D C R #AA5972, P l a in tif f , O R D E R DENYING MOTION TO P R O C E E D IN FORMA PAUPERIS A N D DISMISSING CASE W I T H O U T PREJUDICE P U R S U A N T TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2] C iv il No. 0 9 -2 4 3 9 LAB (BLM) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\LAB\09cv2439-Deny IFP.wpd -1- 09cv2439 LAB (BLM) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. M OTION TO PROCEED IFP A ll parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United S t a te s , except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U .S .C . § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is g ra n te d leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See A n d r e w s v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1 1 7 7 (9th Cir. 1999). Prisoners granted leave to proceed IFP however, remain obligated to pay th e entire fee in installments, regardless of whether the action is ultimately dismissed for any re a s o n . See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2). Prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also submit a "certified copy of the trust fund a c c o u n t statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period im m e d ia te ly preceding the filing of the complaint...." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the c e rtif ie d trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the a v e ra g e monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly b a la n c e in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no a s s e ts . See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); see also Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 850 (9th C ir. 2002). Thereafter, the institution having custody of the prisoner must collect subsequent p a ym e n ts , assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the p ris o n e r's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing f e e is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). W h ile Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), he has not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6m o n th period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S .D . CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners "seeking to bring a c iv il action ...without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund a c co u n t statement (or institutional equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding th e filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). -2- K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\LAB\09cv2439-Deny IFP.wpd 09cv2439 LAB (BLM) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W ith o u t Plaintiff's trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the a p p ro p ria te amount of the filing fee required to initiate this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). T h e re f o re , Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP must be DENIED. II. C ONCLUSION AND ORDER F o r the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) (2) P la in t if f' s Motion to Proceed IFP [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED. T h i s action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing f ee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for failure to successfully move to proceed IFP p u rs u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (3) P la in tif f if GRANTED forty five (45) days from the date this Order is Filed to e ith e r : (1) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which in c lu d e s a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filin g of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a C o u rt-a p p ro v e d form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this m a tte r. If Plaintiff neither pays the $350 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files th e attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his prison trust account sta tem e n t within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court. D A T E D : December 4, 2009 H ONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS U n ite d States District Judge K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\LAB\09cv2439-Deny IFP.wpd -3- 09cv2439 LAB (BLM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?