Sandoval v. Sandoval

Filing 4

ORDER dismissing complaint without prejudice and denying plaintiff's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as moot. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/10/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Over the past several years, Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval has filed in excess of 90 separate actions in this district. 08cv1297, 08cv1621, 08cv1622, 08cv1623, 08cv1848, 08cv1849, 08cv1853, 98cv1854, 08cv1868, 08cv1869, 08cv1870, 08cv1944, 08cv2004, 08cv2005, 08cv2057, 08cv2104, 08cv2105, 08cv2151, 09cv0269, 09cv0422, 09cv423, 09cv0424, 09cv0437, 09cv0438, 09cv0441, 09cv0454, 09cv0455, 09cv0456, 09cv0474, 09cv0475, 09cv0476, 09cv0477, 09cv0478, 09cv0491, 09cv0492, 09cv0493, 09cv0494, 09cv0495, 09cv582, 09cv0583, 09cv585, 09cv586, 09cv0588, 09cv0600, 09cv0642, 09cv1232, 09cv1506, 09cv1506, 09cv1507, 09cv1508, 09cv1514, 09cv1515, 09cv1520, 09cv1524, 09cv1526, 09cv1849, 09cv2122, 09cv2141, 09cv2148, 09cv2204, 09cv2205, 09cv2206, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2244, 09cv2245, 09cv2250, 09cv2251, 09cv2252, 09cv2304, 09cv2305, 09cv2306, 09cv2307, 09cv2308, 09cv2309, 09cv2310, 09cv2311, 09cv2312, 09cv2313, 09cv2450, 09cv2452, 09cv2453, 09cv2462,09cv2463, 09cv2464, 09cv2465, 09cv2466, 09cv2467. Each action was brought in propria persona and in forma pauperis. Each appears to have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The present complaint fairs -109cv2462 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GRACE L. SANDOVAL, vs. SERGIO N. SANDOVAL, Defendant. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09cv2462 JM(JMA) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 no better. Without identifying the basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint sets forth a rambling narrative of charges and conclusions concerning, for example, theft of money from her mother, illegal aliens, the murder of orphans, the German race massacre, drug smuggling and other nefarious acts. As the present complaint, like the scores of previously filed complaints, fails to identify any basis for federal jurisdiction, or to set forth a coherent statement of her claims, the court dismisses the complaint at bar as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is instructed to dismiss the action without prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Until Plaintiff pays the filing fee or demonstrates an imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Clerk of Court is instructed to reject for filing any further documents from Plaintiff in this case. The court also denies Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 10, 2009 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge cc: All parties -2- 09cv2462

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?