Gerth et al v. American Mortgage Express Financial et al

Filing 46

ORDER Denying 44 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint: Because the parties do not address the applicable standard, their joint motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/12/2010. (mjj)

-BGS Gerth et al v. American Mortgage Express Financial et al

Doc. 46

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ROBERT GERTH et al., 12 13 v. 14 AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS FINANCIAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09cv2475-L(RBB) ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On July 9, 2010 Plaintiffs and Defendant First American Title Insurance Company ("First

18 American") filed a Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendant First American Title Insurance 19 Company to Respond to First Amended Complaint. First American's response was due on May 20 26, 2010; accordingly the showing required for an extension is excusable neglect pursuant to 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B). See Pioneer Investment Services Company v. 22 Brunswick Associates, 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993); Kyle v. Campbell Soup Co., 38 F.3d 928 (9th 23 / / / / / 24 / / / / / 25 / / / / / 26 / / / / / 27 / / / / / 28 / / / / /
09cv2475

Dockets.Justia.com

1 Cir. 1994); Pincay v. Andrews, 389 F.3d 853, 855 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Because the parties 2 do not address the applicable standard, their joint motion is DENIED WITHOUT 3 PREJUDICE. 4 5 6 DATED: July 12, 2010 7 8 9 COPY TO: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
09cv2475