Young v. Smalls et al
Filing
168
ORDER ADOPTING 160 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and denying 141 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled and the Report and Recommendation is Adopted. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/3/12.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HOWARD YOUNG,
Case No. 09cv2545 DMS (JMA)
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
vs.
13
14
LARRY SMALLS, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff Howard Young, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. Section 1983 alleging violation of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to United
19
States Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler for a report and recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
20
Section 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.3. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment,
21
which Defendants opposed.
22
Recommendation, recommending to deny Plaintiff’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
23
Procedure 56(d) without prejudice to refiling after the United States District Court for the Eastern
24
District of California had the opportunity to rule on Plaintiff’s motion to quash subpoenas and
25
Defendants have conducted discovery necessary to oppose the motion.
On March 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
26
In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court "shall make
27
a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made," and "may
28
accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate
-1-
09cv2545
1
judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation are
2
OVERRULED and the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for summary
3
judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Report and
4
Recommendation.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: April 3, 2012
8
9
HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?