Gines v. San Diego Metropolitan Transit System et al

Filing 21

ORDER allowing amendment to complaint 20 to substitute BENIGNO ABALOYAN SABAS for "DOE 1" and ROBERT SHIREY for "DOE 2.". Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/8/2010. (tkl) (jrl).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the parties have entered into the Stipulation for Amendment to the Complaint to allow Plaintiff, BERTRAND GINES, to substitute BENIGNO ABALOYAN SABAS for "DOE 1" and ROBERT SHIREY for "DOE 2." UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT ) SYSTEM; SAN DIEGO TROLLEY, INC.; ) SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION; ) ) HERITAGE SECURITY SERVICES (A.K.A. TRANSIT SYSTEMS SECURITY); ) ALBERT MOYA, an individual; MICHAEL ) VACCARIELLO, an individual; RICHARD ) ) SHIRLEY, an individual; ABALOYAN SABAS, an individual; TRANSIT SYSTEMS ) ) SECURITY SUPERVISOR [name ) unknown], an individual; and DOES 1 ) through 50, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) BERTRAND GINES, an individual CASE NO. 09-CV-2866-JM-POR ORDER ALLOWING AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT [Docket No. 20] Hearing Date: March 16, 2010 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 16 Judge: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller Action Filed: December 3, 2009 GOOD CAUSE NOW APPEARING: ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff, BERTRAND GINES, be allowed to file his amendment to the complaint, a copy of which was attached to plaintiff's request for order allowing amendment to the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 8, 2010 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?