Albertson v. Monumental Insurance Company et al

Filing 7

ORDER by Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Continue (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/6/2010.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION * E-filed 4/7/09* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California JAMES O. ALBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. MONUMENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GLOBE LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, DOES 1-10, Defendants. / Case No. CV 08-5441 HRL ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 4/7/09 The court has received plaintiff's "Ex Parte Motion for Enlargement of Time." Plaintiff seeks continuation of the initial case management conference, currently set for April 7, 2009 at 1:30 pm because the defendant was only recently served. Defendant does not oppose the motion. Good cause having been shown, the court now GRANTS IN PART plaintiff's motion. The initial case management conference is CONTINUED to June 16, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 2, 5th floor, United States District Court, San Jose. The parties must file their Joint Case Management Statement, and Consent or Declination to Magistrate Jurisdiction not later than June 9, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS NOTICE WILL BE SENT VIA ECF. * Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel. Dated: 4/7/09 /s/ mpk Chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloyd United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?