Moncrief et al v. Washington Mutual, FA et al

Filing 19

ORDER denying 17 ex parte application for Preliminary Injunction of denial of application for temporary restraining order. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 5/7/2010. (tkl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' ex parte application for a preliminary injunction and reconsideration of the Court's denial of their request for a temporary restraining order. Defendants oppose the application. Plaintiffs' application is in large part the same as their application for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiffs have provided additional argument in an attempt to show there is a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims, but they have not tipped the scale in their favor. Plaintiffs have also failed to show the existence of any of the requirements for reconsideration of the Court's order /// /// /// /// -1WASHINGTON MUTUAL, F.A., et al., Defendants. GEOFFREY MONCRIEF, LEILA MONCRIEF, individuals, vs. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 10CV350 DMS (RBB) ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [Docket No. 17] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10cv350 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 denying their application for a temporary restraining order. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' ex parte application for a preliminary injunction and for reconsideration of the Court's previous order is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 7, 2010 HON. DANA M. SABRAW United States District Judge -2- 10cv350

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?