Juarez v. AFNI et al

Filing 7

ORDER Denying 6 Ex Parte Application of Defendant AFNI, Inc. to Appear Telephonically at the July 23, 2010 Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 7/15/10. (vet)

Download PDF
-BLM Juarez v. AFNI et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. AFNI and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. ISRAEL JUAREZ, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10cv732-L (BLM) ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION OF DEFENDANT AFNI, INC. TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE JULY 23, 2010 EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE ECF No. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA By application dated July 15, 2010, Defendant AFNI, Inc. requests permission to appear telephonically at the July 23, 2010 Early Neutral Evaluation Conference ("ENE"). ECF No. 6. Defendant argues that good cause exists because its representative resides in Bloomington, Illinois and the costs associated with traveling to this district far outweigh the value of any possible settlement of this case and the damages Plaintiff alleges. Defendant's counsel submits that Plaintiff does not oppose the request. ECF No. 6-2. As this Court explained in its order scheduling the ENE, personal attendance is required absent extraordinary circumstances. ECF No. 4. The Court finds that the Id. justification set forth by Defendant does not constitute extraordinary circumstances and, therefore, DENIES Defendant's application. /// 10cv732-L (BLM) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 All parties with full settlement authority shall appear in person for the July 23, 2010 ENE. Failure to appear may result in the imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 15, 2010 BARBARA L. MAJOR United States Magistrate Judge -2- 10cv732-L (BLM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?