Saibu v. Cash

Filing 18

ORDER denying Certificate of Appealability. In this case, the Court finds that the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason, nor could the issues be resolved in a different manner. Further, the Court finds that the questions are not adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Accordingly, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/10/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service). (akr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SADIQ SAIBU, Civil No. 12 Petitioner, 13 14 ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY v. BRENDA M. CASH, Warden Respondent. 15 16 17 10-0844-CAB On August 5, 2011, this Court entered judgment denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in this case. 18 Rule 11 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases states, “[t[he district court 19 must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the 20 applicant.” A certificate of appealability should be issued only where the petition presents “a 21 substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To meet 22 this threshold showing, Petitioner must show that: (1) the issues are debatable among jurists of 23 reason, (2) that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner, or (3) that the questions 24 are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Lambright v. Stewart, 220 F.3d 25 1022, 1024-25 (9th Cir. 2000) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); Barefoot v. 26 Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983)). 27 // 28 // -1- 1 In this case, the Court finds that the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason, nor 2 could the issues be resolved in a different manner. Further, the Court finds that the questions 3 are not adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Accordingly, the Court DENIES 4 a certificate of appealability. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: August 10, 2011 8 9 CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?