Knuff v. Gevisser

Filing 2

ORDER: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/7/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank IFP motion form also was mailed to the removing Defendant.) (mdc)

Download PDF
-WVG Knuff v. Gevisser Doc. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHARLES KNUFF, Plaintiff, vs. GARY S. GEVISSER, ADAM TUCKER, et al., Defendants. HAYES, Judge: Defendant Gary S. Gevisser, a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a document entitled, "Motion Demand & Notice for Dismissal and Removal for Injunction, Relief, Demurrer & Declaration." (Doc. # 1 at 1). The Court construes this document as a notice of removal. REQUIREMENTS OF THE REMOVAL STATUTE "The venue of removed actions is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a).... Section 1441(a) expressly provides that the proper venue of a removed action is `the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.'" Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc., 345 U.S. 663, 665-66 (1953) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). The removal statute also provides: A defendant ... desiring to remove any civil action ... from a State court shall file in the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such action is pending a notice of removal ... and containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant ... in such action. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). The removing Defendant has failed to comply with the removal statute by failing to -110cv1374-WQH-WVG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 10cv1374-WQH-WVG ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 attach to the notice of removal "a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such 2 defendant" in the state court action. Id. It appears from the documents before this Court that 3 Defendant is attempting to remove a state court action pending in Dallas County, Texas. Any 4 action pending in Texas state court must be removed to the appropriate United States District 5 Court in Texas. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 6 7 FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE "The clerk of each district court shall require the parties instituting any civil action, suit 8 or proceeding in such court, whether by original process, removal or otherwise, to pay a filing 9 fee of $350." 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay this 10 filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 11 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); City of Ashland 12 v. Cooper, 863 F.2d 691, 692-93 (9th Cir. 1988) (removal). 13 The removing Defendant has not prepaid the $350 filing fee required to commence a 14 civil action, nor has he submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, this case 15 must be dismissed. 16 17 CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for 18 failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Clerk of the Court shall provide the removing Defendant with this 20 Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 21 Pauperis." If the filing fee is paid or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, this 22 action may then be subject to dismissal if the requirements of the removal statute are not 23 satisfied, including but not limited to filing the notice of removal in the proper venue and 24 attaching to the notice of removal "a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon 25 such defendant" in the state court action. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). 26 DATED: July 7, 2010 27 28 WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge -210cv1374-WQH-WVG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?