Sandoval v. Bobal

Filing 4

ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Denying As Moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/7/10. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/7/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet)

Download PDF
-BLM Sandoval v. Bobal Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge 10cv1392 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GRACE L. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 10cv1392 BTM (BLM) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; [Doc. 2] JAMILLAH BOBAL, Defendant. DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; [Doc. 3] DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval, proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint [Doc. 1], along with a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") [Doc. 2] and a Request for Appointment Counsel [Doc. 3]. Based on the information Plaintiffs provides, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's IFP motion. The Court is obligated to review a complaint filed IFP sua sponte and must dismiss the action if it determines that the complaint is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim for relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's complaint is frivolous and void of any plausible claims for relief. The Complaint is but one in a series of frivolous complaints filed by Plaintiff. Because "it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment," the Court DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend. Franklin v. Murphy, 245 F.2d 1221, 1228 n.9 (9th Cir. 1984). As such, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 7, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?