Ritchie v. Sempra Energy

Filing 272

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: It is hereby Ordered that Sempras motion to dismiss is Granted, and Ritchie's motion for leave to file aTAC is Denied. Further because no subsequent attempt to amend the complaint could save the remaining conversion claim from being time-barred, this case is Dismissed With Prejudice. It is So Ordered. (jjg)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff
Ramon Eugenio Sanchez Ritchie
V.

Civil Action No. 10-cv-1513-CAB-KSC

Defendant
Sempra Energy, a California corporation
Counter Claimant
Sempra Energy, a California corporation
Counter Defendant
Jose Susumo Azano Matsura; Ramon Eugenio
Sanchez Ritchie

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
V.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
It is hereby Ordered that Sempra’s motion to dismiss is Granted, and Ritchie’s motion for leave to file a
TAC is Denied. Further because no subsequent attempt to amend the complaint could save the
remaining conversion claim from being time-barred, this case is Dismissed With Prejudice.
It is So Ordered.

Date:

9/20/17

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy