Brain Life, LLC v. Elekta Inc. et al
Filing
118
ORDER granting Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint without Prejudice to Plaintiff amending the complaint. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend its complaint on or before February 11, 2013. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/24/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Brain Life, LLC,
12
CASE NO. 10cv01539-CAB (BGS)
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
14
Medtronic, Inc., Varian Medical Systems,
Inc., Brainlab, Inc.,
15
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
[Doc. Nos. 98, 100]
Defendants.
16
17
Having considered the papers filed in conjunction with the pending motions to dismiss [Doc.
18
Nos. 98, 100], the Court finds that Plaintiff’s allegations of contributory infringement do not meet the
19
pleading requirements imposed by the Supreme Court in Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544
20
(2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Accordingly, the motions to dismiss [Doc. Nos.
21
98, 100] are granted without prejudice to Plaintiff amending the complaint. Plaintiff’s papers
22
demonstrate its ability to cure the pleading deficiencies at issue. As a result, the Court grants Plaintiff
23
leave to amend its complaint on or before February 11, 2013 to sufficiently plead contributory
24
infringement and remove allegations against dismissed parties.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 24, 2013
27
28
CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO
United States District Judge
10cv01539
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?