Brain Life, LLC v. Elekta Inc. et al

Filing 118

ORDER granting Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint without Prejudice to Plaintiff amending the complaint. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend its complaint on or before February 11, 2013. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/24/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Brain Life, LLC, 12 CASE NO. 10cv01539-CAB (BGS) Plaintiff, vs. 13 14 Medtronic, Inc., Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Brainlab, Inc., 15 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Doc. Nos. 98, 100] Defendants. 16 17 Having considered the papers filed in conjunction with the pending motions to dismiss [Doc. 18 Nos. 98, 100], the Court finds that Plaintiff’s allegations of contributory infringement do not meet the 19 pleading requirements imposed by the Supreme Court in Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 20 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Accordingly, the motions to dismiss [Doc. Nos. 21 98, 100] are granted without prejudice to Plaintiff amending the complaint. Plaintiff’s papers 22 demonstrate its ability to cure the pleading deficiencies at issue. As a result, the Court grants Plaintiff 23 leave to amend its complaint on or before February 11, 2013 to sufficiently plead contributory 24 infringement and remove allegations against dismissed parties. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 24, 2013 27 28 CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO United States District Judge 10cv01539

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?