Bailon v. AACH Holding Co., No. 2, LLC et al
Filing
58
ORDER denying 56 Ex Parte Application for an Order Directing the Issuance of a Temporary Visa. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/22/12. (kaj)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAFAEL BERNARDO BAILON,
CASE NO. 10cv1654-H (NLS)
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A
TEMPORARY VISA
vs.
13
14
AACH HOLDING CO., No. 2, LLC, et al.,
[Doc. No. 56.]
Defendants.
15
16
17
On March 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion in this action. (Dkt. No. 56.) He is
18
seeking an Order from this Court “directing the U.S. Department of State and the Department of
19
Homeland Security to issue a temporary, nonimmigrant visa to Plaintiff for 90 days.” Id. at 7.1 He
20
asserts this visa is necessary to complete his medical treatment and to complete this action. Id. at 6.
21
Defendants oppose the motion. (Dkt. No. 57.)
22
Plaintiff cites no authority to suggest that this Court has the jurisdiction to compel the issuance
23
of a visa to a foreign national. It is well-settled that a consul’s decision to grant or deny a visa is not
24
subject to judicial review, except under very limited circumstances which are not present here. See
25
Li Hing of Hong Kong, Inc. v. Levin, 800 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1986); Ventura-Escamilla v. INS, 647
26
F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1981).
27
///
28
1
Citations to Plaintiff’s motion refer to the internal page numbers of the document.
-1-
10cv1654-H
1
ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff’s motion for this Court to direct the issuance of a visa is hereby
2
DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: March 22, 2012
6
7
8
Hon. Nita L. Stormes
U.S. Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
10cv1654-H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?