Estrada v. Neotti
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and (2) denying Petition. (Re: Doc. 97 ). This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R and the Petitioner's objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full and denies the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/2/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOEY MANUEL ESTRADA,
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND (2)
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary,
CASE NO. 10cv2014 DMS (KSC)
Petitioner Joey Estrada, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas
16 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford
17 issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny the petition. On
18 May 12, 2014, Petitioner filed objections to the R&R.
This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and the Petitioner’s
20 objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full and denies the petition for
21 writ of habeas corpus. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 DATED: June 2, 2014
HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?