Estrada v. Neotti

Filing 104

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and (2) denying Petition. (Re: Doc. 97 ). This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R and the Petitioner's objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full and denies the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/2/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JOEY MANUEL ESTRADA,

11
12
13

Petitioner,
vs.

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND (2)
DENYING PETITION

MATTHEW CATE, Secretary,
Respondent.

14
15

CASE NO. 10cv2014 DMS (KSC)

Petitioner Joey Estrada, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas

16 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford
17 issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny the petition. On
18 May 12, 2014, Petitioner filed objections to the R&R.
19

This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and the Petitioner’s

20 objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full and denies the petition for
21 writ of habeas corpus. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability.
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 DATED: June 2, 2014
24
25
26

HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge

27
28
-1-

10cv2014