United Brands Company, Inc. v. Anheuser-Bush, Inc.
Filing
45
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 11/28/2011 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge William McCurine Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 10/17/11.(cge) (jcj).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
UNITED BRANDS COMPANY, INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 10-CV-2281 AJB (WMc)
NOTICE AND ORDER FOR EARLY
NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE
17
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of your
18
case will be held on November 28, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in the chambers
19
of the Honorable William McCurine, Jr., United States Magistrate
20
Judge, 940 Front Street, Courtroom C, San Diego, California, 92101.
21
Absent extraordinary circumstances, requests for continuances will
22
not be considered unless submitted in writing no less than fourteen
23
(14) days prior to the scheduled conference.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the
25
United
26
California, all named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s)
27
whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into settlement
28
shall appear in person at the conference, shall be prepared to
States
District
Court
for
the
Southern
District
of
10cv2281 AJB (WMc)
1
discuss the claims and defenses, and shall be legally and factually
2
prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the Early Neutral
3
Evaluation conference.
4
individual present at the settlement conference has the unfettered
5
discretion and authority to: 1) fully explore settlement options
6
and to agree at that time to any settlement options; 2) agree at
7
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties; 3)
8
change the settlement position of a party; and 4) negotiate
9
monetary awards without being restricted to a specific sum certain.
10
Where the suit involves the United States or one of its
11
agencies, only United States counsel with full settlement authority
12
need appear.
13
counsel only is not acceptable.
Full authority to settle means that the
As to all other parties, appearance by litigation
14
Requests to be excused from attendance for extraordinary
15
circumstances must be in writing and received by the Court at least
16
fourteen (14) days prior to the conference.
17
counsel and parties to appear in person will be cause for the
18
imposition of sanctions.
19
limited to, the attorney's fees and travel costs of the other
20
parties in the case.
21
and will be reset to another date. All conference discussions will
22
be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential.
23
Failure of required
Sanctions will include, but are not
In addition, the conference will not proceed
Counsel are required to read, and comply with, Local Rule
24
83.4, which is specifically incorporated herein as though fully
25
set forth."
26
Counsel for any non-English speaking parties is responsible
27
for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the
28
conference.
2
10cv2281 AJB (WMc)
1
In cases where a party is incarcerated at the time of the
2
scheduled conference, arrangements will be made for the
3
incarcerated party to appear telephonically.
4
The parties are required to submit a short Early Neutral
5
Evaluation Conference Statement about the case on a confidential
6
basis no later than seven (7) days before the conference.
7
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply
8
to this case.
9
26(f) conference, unless otherwise permitted by Rule 26(f) or
10
All discovery shall be stayed until after the Rule
court order.
11
In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral
12
Evaluation Conference, the parties shall also be prepared to
13
discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the
14
conference:
15
1.
Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil
16
Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of
17
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D);
18
19
2.
26(f) conference;
20
21
The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
3.
The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging
the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and
22
4.
The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant
23
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
3
10cv2281 AJB (WMc)
1
Plaintiff's counsel shall give written notice of the
2
Early Neutral Evaluation Conference to parties responding to the
3
complaint after October 17, 2011.
4
5
6
7
Questions regarding this case may be directed to the
Magistrate Judge's law clerk at (619) 557-6624.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 17, 2011
8
9
10
Hon. William McCurine, Jr.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
10cv2281 AJB (WMc)
1
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO TRIAL
BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. ยง
4
636(c), YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
5
THIS DISTRICT MAY, UPON THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, ON FORM 1A
6
AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE, CONDUCT ANY OR ALL PROCEEDINGS,
7
INCLUDING A JURY OR NON-JURY TRIAL, AND ORDER THE ENTRY OF A
8
FINAL JUDGMENT.
9
FOR OBTAINING THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, SHOULD THEY DESIRE TO
10
11
COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
CONSENT.
YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT YOUR DECISION TO CONSENT OR
12
NOT TO CONSENT IS ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY AND SHOULD BE COMMUNICATED
13
SOLELY TO THE CLERK OF COURT.
14
THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED
15
BE INFORMED OF YOUR DECISION.
16
ONLY IF ALL PARTIES CONSENT WILL
JUDGMENTS OF THE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES ARE
17
APPEALABLE TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
18
STATUTE AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
10cv2281 AJB (WMc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?