United Brands Company, Inc. v. Anheuser-Bush, Inc.

Filing 45

NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 11/28/2011 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge William McCurine Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 10/17/11.(cge) (jcj).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 UNITED BRANDS COMPANY, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-CV-2281 AJB (WMc) NOTICE AND ORDER FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of your 18 case will be held on November 28, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in the chambers 19 of the Honorable William McCurine, Jr., United States Magistrate 20 Judge, 940 Front Street, Courtroom C, San Diego, California, 92101. 21 Absent extraordinary circumstances, requests for continuances will 22 not be considered unless submitted in writing no less than fourteen 23 (14) days prior to the scheduled conference. 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the 25 United 26 California, all named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s) 27 whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into settlement 28 shall appear in person at the conference, shall be prepared to States District Court for the Southern District of 10cv2281 AJB (WMc) 1 discuss the claims and defenses, and shall be legally and factually 2 prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the Early Neutral 3 Evaluation conference. 4 individual present at the settlement conference has the unfettered 5 discretion and authority to: 1) fully explore settlement options 6 and to agree at that time to any settlement options; 2) agree at 7 that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties; 3) 8 change the settlement position of a party; and 4) negotiate 9 monetary awards without being restricted to a specific sum certain. 10 Where the suit involves the United States or one of its 11 agencies, only United States counsel with full settlement authority 12 need appear. 13 counsel only is not acceptable. Full authority to settle means that the As to all other parties, appearance by litigation 14 Requests to be excused from attendance for extraordinary 15 circumstances must be in writing and received by the Court at least 16 fourteen (14) days prior to the conference. 17 counsel and parties to appear in person will be cause for the 18 imposition of sanctions. 19 limited to, the attorney's fees and travel costs of the other 20 parties in the case. 21 and will be reset to another date. All conference discussions will 22 be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. 23 Failure of required Sanctions will include, but are not In addition, the conference will not proceed Counsel are required to read, and comply with, Local Rule 24 83.4, which is specifically incorporated herein as though fully 25 set forth." 26 Counsel for any non-English speaking parties is responsible 27 for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the 28 conference. 2 10cv2281 AJB (WMc) 1 In cases where a party is incarcerated at the time of the 2 scheduled conference, arrangements will be made for the 3 incarcerated party to appear telephonically. 4 The parties are required to submit a short Early Neutral 5 Evaluation Conference Statement about the case on a confidential 6 basis no later than seven (7) days before the conference. 7 Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply 8 to this case. 9 26(f) conference, unless otherwise permitted by Rule 26(f) or 10 All discovery shall be stayed until after the Rule court order. 11 In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral 12 Evaluation Conference, the parties shall also be prepared to 13 discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the 14 conference: 15 1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil 16 Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D); 18 19 2. 26(f) conference; 20 21 The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3. The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and 22 4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant 23 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 10cv2281 AJB (WMc) 1 Plaintiff's counsel shall give written notice of the 2 Early Neutral Evaluation Conference to parties responding to the 3 complaint after October 17, 2011. 4 5 6 7 Questions regarding this case may be directed to the Magistrate Judge's law clerk at (619) 557-6624. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 17, 2011 8 9 10 Hon. William McCurine, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 10cv2281 AJB (WMc) 1 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. ยง 4 636(c), YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF 5 THIS DISTRICT MAY, UPON THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, ON FORM 1A 6 AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE, CONDUCT ANY OR ALL PROCEEDINGS, 7 INCLUDING A JURY OR NON-JURY TRIAL, AND ORDER THE ENTRY OF A 8 FINAL JUDGMENT. 9 FOR OBTAINING THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, SHOULD THEY DESIRE TO 10 11 COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE CONSENT. YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT YOUR DECISION TO CONSENT OR 12 NOT TO CONSENT IS ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY AND SHOULD BE COMMUNICATED 13 SOLELY TO THE CLERK OF COURT. 14 THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED 15 BE INFORMED OF YOUR DECISION. 16 ONLY IF ALL PARTIES CONSENT WILL JUDGMENTS OF THE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES ARE 17 APPEALABLE TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS 18 STATUTE AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 10cv2281 AJB (WMc)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?