Hohenberg v. Ferrero USA, Inc

Filing 146

CERTIFICATE of Counsel re 145 MOTION to Vacate Judgment and for Indicative Ruling Certificate of Service by Grenville Thomas Pridham on behalf of Courtney Drey, Andrea Pridham (Pridham, Grenville) (ag).

Download PDF
1 2 3 Grenville Pridham 2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 486-5144 grenville@grenvillepridham.com Counsel for Objectors COURTNEY DREY and ANDREA PRIDHAM 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: FERRERO LITIGATION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Pleading Type: Class Action CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF OBJECTORS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(B), AND FOR AN INDICATIVE RULING; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE FOR THE PURPOSES OF FILING THIS MOTION Judge: The Hon. Marilyn Huff Hearing: December 3, 2012 Time: 10:30 A.M. Location: Courtroom 13 19 20 21 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State California. I am over the age of 23 eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 2522 Chambers Road, 24 Tustin, Suite 100, Tustin, CA 92780. On November 5, 2012, I served via the CM/ECF system the 25 documents described below: 26 1. Objectors’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Judgment under Rule 60(b), and for 27 an Indicative Ruling; Or, in the Alternative, for Leave to Intervene for the Purposes of 28 Filing this Motion Page 1 of 2 In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Certificate of Service of Objectors’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Judgment and for an Indicative Ruling 1 2. Objectors’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion 2 3. Exhibit A in support of Objectors’ Motion: Order in Red v. Unilever, dated September 14, 3 4 2010, Docket Entry 103, Case No. 10-387 (N.D. Cal. JW) 4. 5 6 Exhibit B in support of Objectors’ Motion: Order in Levitt v. Yelp,! Inc., dated August 24, 2010, Docket Entry 96, Case No. 10-2351 (N.D. Cal. MHP) 5. Exhibit C in support of Objectors’ Motion: Order in Weston Firm PC v. Reese Richman 7 LLP; Beck & Lee, P.A., dated September 30, 2010 (S.D. Cal. CAB) 8 by Notice of Electronic Filing, which is a notice generated by the CM/ECF system at the time the 9 documents listed above were filed with the Court, to lead counsel listed by CM/ECF as “ATTORNEY TO 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BE NOTICED.” I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on November 5, 2012, in Orange, California. /s/ Grenville Pridham Grenville Pridham 2522 Chambers Road, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 486-5144 grenville@grenvillepridham.com Counsel for Objectors Drey and Pridham 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2 In re Ferrero Litigation, Case No. 3:11-cv-00205-H-KSC Certificate of Service of Objectors’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Judgment and for an Indicative Ruling

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?