Diaz v. Doe et al

Filing 7

Judgment and ORDER DISMISSING CASE Under Rule 4(m) F.R.Civ.P. for Want of Prosecution. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/5/12.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 fJ1 H - t;
'" i

JESUS DIAZ,

CASE

plr~ -i.·
, ,.

NO.11CV055~nJ,J;,.S,(W~C}~"
:-L +.

~~':: i

,

fir' ,\ C{l.l
.
1

J.
Ii

7
.,.

.,

.. JF,. ~tL

rf"

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL BY COU~TY
UNDER RULE 4(m} F.R.Civ.P. FOR WANT
OF PROSECUTION

vs.
JOHN DOE, ET AL.

~~ ,,'+oJ

,
Defendant.

The above-entitled cause, having come before the court on a calendar called
pursuant to notice under Rule 4(m}, F.R.Civ.P. for failure to serve
process, and it appearing to the court that the summons and complaint have
not been served, and no extension of time to serve has been requested,
therefore,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled cause is hereby
dismissed as to all defendants without prejudice, for want of prosecution.

7./'J-"Y~J~

DATED: JANUARY 5, 2012

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ENTERED ON