Dr. Greens, Inc. v. Stephens et al

Filing 370

ORDER Granting in Part Attorney Gary Eastman's Ex Parte Application (Doc. No. 368 ). The Order to Show Cause scheduled for February 7, 2020, at 11:30 am, and related briefing schedule, is VACATED. Counter-Defendants and attorney Gary Eastm an are to file a Response to the Order to Show Cause by February 14, 2020. If Spectrum wishes to reply to the Response, they must do so by February 18, 2020. The Order to Show Cause hearing is rescheduled for February 20, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. before Judge John A. Houston. The Court's Order to Show Cause, (doc. no. 367 ), shall, in all other respects, remain the same, specifically including the order to preserve all assets. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 1/31/2020. (tcf)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

DR. GREENS, INC., a California
Corporation,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
ATTORNEY GARY EASTMAN’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION (Doc. No.
368).

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No.: 11cv638-JAH (KSC)

v.

15

SPECTRUM LABORATORIES, LLC, an
Ohio limited liability company,

16

Defendant.

17
18

SPECTRUM LABORATORIES, LLC, an
Ohio limited liability company,

19

Counter-Plaintiff,

20

v.

21

DR. GREENS, INC., a California
Corporation,

22

Counter-Defendant.

23
24

//

25
26

//

27
28

//
1
11cv638-JAH (KSC)

1

On January 21, 2020, Counter-Plaintiff Spectrum Laboratories, LLC, (“Spectrum”)

2

filed a motion requesting the Court issue an Order to Show Cause against Counter-

3

Defendants Dr. Greens, Inc., Matthew Robert Green (collectively, “Counter-Defendants”),

4

and their trial counsel, Gary Eastman. Doc. No. 366. The motion was granted on January

5

29, 2020. Doc. No. 367. The Parties were Ordered to appear before the Court on February

6

7, 2020, and file a pleading addressing the assertions that the Parties violated the Court’s

7

February 23, 2018, Order barring Dr. Greens and Matthew Green “from transferring any

8

accounts held by Dr. Greens… [other than] routine business expenses that [Mr. Green] has

9

been paying to keep [his] business going… until further Order of the Court.” Doc. Nos.

10

334, at 8-9; 367. Additionally, the Court Ordered Counter-Defendants and attorney Gary

11

Eastman, “their agents and assigns, [to] preserve all assets, excluding identified assets

12

needed for day to day operational expenses, in which [the Parties] hold an interest, directly

13

or indirectly, including but not limited to all personal investment accounts and personal

14

bank accounts, all business investment accounts, business bank accounts. . . until further

15

Order of this Court.” Doc. No. 367, at 2-3.

16

On January 30, 2020, counsel for attorney Gary Eastman filed an ex parte application

17

requesting the Court vacate the order to show cause and reinstate Spectrum’s motion for

18

briefing and hearing in due course. Doc. No. 368, at 5. Alternatively, the ex parte

19

application requests a modification of the hearing and briefing schedule set forth in the

20

Order to Show Cause in order to allow for attorney Gary Eastman and his new counsel

21

additional time, arguing that a failure to provide additional time would result in substantial

22

prejudice “if put to the task of mounting an expedited defense in a matter of days.” Id.

23

Specifically, the application asserts that “[they] cannot assimilate the facts; gather and

24

compile the relevant documents and evidence; complete its legal research; and draft a

25

meaningful and complete written opposition to either the Motion or the OSC” in the time

26

allotted by the Court. Id. at 3. As such, the application asserts that due process

27

considerations entitles Mr. Eastman adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to

28

respond. Id. at 3 (citing Int’l Union v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821, 927 (1994)).
2
11cv638-JAH (KSC)

1

Spectrum filed an opposition to the ex parte application on January 31, 2020. Doc.

2

No. 369. Therein, Spectrum argues granting of the application would result in prejudice,

3

as “Spectrum is very concerned about what could happen to the assets with another delay.”

4

Id. at 4-5. Additionally, Spectrum asserts that attorney Gary Eastman will not be suffer any

5

violations of his due process rights, since the Court is providing both adequate notice and

6

an opportunity to be heard. Id. at 3. Spectrum also asserts that in anticipation of the

7

February 7, 2020, hearing date, “counsel for Spectrum. . . have prioritized preparations for

8

responding to briefing and the hearing, including booking nonrefundable flights and

9

prepaid hotels, totaling over one thousand dollars. Any delays would prejudice Spectrum

10

and its counsel and cost significant money to Spectrum.” Id. at 5.

11

While all requisite due process considerations—specifically notice and an

12

opportunity to be heard—are satisfied by the current schedule set out in the Order to Show

13

Cause, after careful consideration of the Parties’ pleadings, the Court finds it appropriate

14

to alter the briefing schedule and reset the Order to Show Cause hearing. See United States

15

v. Ayres, 166 F.3d 991, 995 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[C]ivil contempt may be imposed in an

16

ordinary civil proceeding upon notice and an opportunity to be heard.). Despite attorney

17

Gary Eastman’s representations that that “Spectrum’s charges… are factually and legally

18

infirm[,]” the allegations are particularly troubling, therefore, the ex parte application by

19

attorney Gary Eastman is only GRANTED in part to allow the Parties additional time to

20

submit their responses to the allegations in Spectrum’s pleading and the Court’s Order.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

22

1.

23
24

related briefing schedule, is VACATED.
2.

25
26
27

The Order to Show Cause scheduled for February 7, 2020, at 11:30 am, and

Counter-Defendants and attorney Gary Eastman are to file a Response to the
Order to Show Cause by February 14, 2020.

3.

If Spectrum wishes to reply to the Response, they must do so by February
18, 2020.

28
3
11cv638-JAH (KSC)

1

4.

2
3

10:30 a.m.
5.

4
5

The Order to Show Cause hearing is rescheduled for February 20, 2020, at

The Court’s Order to Show Cause, (doc. no. 367), shall, in all other respects,
remain the same, specifically including the order to preserve all assets.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

DATED:

January 31, 2020

9
10

_________________________________

11

JOHN A. HOUSTON
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
11cv638-JAH (KSC)