Yeoman et al v. Ikea U.S.A. West, Inc. et al
Filing
232
ORDER Granting 170 192 212 Motions to Seal. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/18/2014. (rlu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
12
REID YEOMAN and RITA
MEDELLIN, on Behalf of
Themselves and All Others Similarly
Situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
11
14
15
16
v.
IKEA U.S.A WEST, INC. and
DOES 1-25, Inclusive,
Case No. 11-cv-00701-BAS(BGS)
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(ECF Nos. 170, 192 and 212)
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pending before the Court are three motions filed by Plaintiff Rita Medellin
(“Plaintiff”) to file documents under seal pursuant to a stipulated protective order.
An Order Regarding Confidential and Trade Secret Information was issued in this
case on August 29, 2011. (ECF No. 21 (“Protective Order”).) Plaintiff seeks to file
several documents under seal pursuant to the Protective Order in support of her
motions in limine.
Plaintiff contends that the documents contain information
designated “Confidential” by Defendant IKEA U.S. West, Inc. (“Defendant”).
(ECF No. 170 at p. 1; ECF No. 192 at p. 2; ECF No. 212 at p. 1.) Plaintiff asserts
that she cannot articulate good cause for sealing the unredacted documents, but
submits such documents for sealing pending good cause shown by Defendant.
–1–
11cv701
1
(ECF No. 170 at p. 1; ECF No. 192 at p. 2; ECF No. 212 at p. 1.)
2
“Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy
3
public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’”
4
Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)
5
(citing Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)).
6
“Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong
7
presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.”
8
Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). Parties seeking to
9
seal judicial records relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming
10
the presumption with “compelling reasons” that outweigh the general history of
11
access and the public policies favoring disclosure. Id. at 1178–79.
Id. (citing Foltz v. State
12
Records attached to non-dispositive motions, however, are not subject to the
13
strong presumption of access. Id. at 1179. Because the documents attached to non-
14
dispositive motions “are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the
15
underlying cause of action,” parties moving to seal must meet the lower “good
16
cause” standard of Rule 26(c).
17
protective order is not itself sufficient to show good cause for sealing particular
18
documents. See Foltz., 331 F.3d at 1133 (“[A] party seeking the protection of the
19
court via a blanket protective order typically does not make a ‘good cause’ showing
20
required by Rule 26(c) with respect to any particular document.”); see also
21
Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180 (requiring a “particularized showing” of good cause);
22
Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
Id. (internal quotations omitted).
A blanket
23
The Protective Order in this case prohibits “[b]lanket designation of
24
documents or information as Confidential without regard to specific contents of
25
each document or piece of information.” (Protective Order at ¶ 7.) Rather, “[t]he
26
designation of any material as ‘Confidential’ pursuant to th[e Protective] Order
27
shall constitute the verification of the Designating Party and its counsel that the
28
material constitutes Confidential Information,” which is defined to mean all
–2–
11cv701
1
“documents and information provided in discovery that is Confidential pursuant to
2
applicable law.” (Id. at ¶¶ 3, 7.)
3
The Court has considered each of the documents the parties have designated
4
for sealing and, for good cause appearing, GRANTS Plaintiff’s motions to seal
5
(ECF Nos. 170, 192 and 212). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
6
following documents shall be filed under seal:
7
(1)
Unredacted version of Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and
8
Authorities in Support of Motion In Limine No. 4 to Exclude
9
Witnesses Not Disclosed During Discovery;
10
(2)
Exhibits ‘Q’ and ‘S’ to the Declaration of Gene J. Stonebarger in
11
Support of Plaintiff’s Motions In Limine Nos. 1 through 5 as Sealed
12
Lodged Proposed Documents with this Motion;
13
(3)
Unredacted Declaration of Gene J. Stonebarger in Support of
14
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant IKEA U.S. West, Inc.’s Motion In
15
Limine #1 to Bifurcate Trial;
16
(4)
Unredacted Exhibit ‘C’ attached to the Declaration of Gene J.
17
Stonebarger in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant IKEA
18
U.S. West, Inc.’s Motion In Limine # 1 to Bifurcate Trial;
19
(5)
Plaintiff’s Unredacted Opposition to Defendant IKEA U.S. West,
20
Inc.’s Renewed Motion In Limine #2 to Exclude IKEA’s “Process for
21
Entering ZIP Codes at the Register” (IKEA 000286);
22
(6)
Unredacted Exhibit ‘A’ attached to the Declaration of Gene J.
23
Stonebarger In Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant IKEA
24
U.S. West, Inc.’s Renewed Motion In Limine #2 to Exclude IKEA’s
25
“Process for Entering ZIP Codes at the Register” (IKEA 000286);
26
(7)
Unredacted Exhibit ‘F’ attached to the Declaration of Gene J.
27
Stonebarger In Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant IKEA
28
U.S. West, Inc.’s Renewed Motion In Limine #2 to Exclude IKEA’s
–3–
11cv701
“Process for Entering ZIP Codes at the Register” (IKEA 000286);
1
2
(8)
Unredacted Exhibit ‘G’ attached to the Declaration of Gene J.
3
Stonebarger In Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant IKEA
4
U.S. West, Inc.’s Renewed Motion In Limine #2 to Exclude IKEA’s
5
“Process for Entering ZIP Codes at the Register” (IKEA 000286);
6
(9)
Unredacted version of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion In
7
Limine No. 4 to Exclude Witnesses Not Disclosed During Discovery;
8
and
9
(10) Exhibits ‘2’ and ‘3’ to the Declaration of Gene J. Stonebarger In
10
Support of Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine No. 4 to
11
Exclude Witnesses Not Disclosed During Discovery.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: August 18, 2014
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–4–
11cv701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?