Tran v. Capital Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER REMANDING CASE; Pursuant to Plaintiff's ex parte motion 10 and the Defendants' statement of non-opposition 11 , Plaintiff's RICO claims are dismissed with prejudice, and this case is remanded to state court; the Clerk is directed to close this case; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/6/11 (cc: State Court) (kaj)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TUAN TRAN,

CASE NO. 11cv1521-LAB
Plaintiff,

12

ORDER REMANDING CASE

vs.
13
14

CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC, a California
corporation, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Pursuant to Plaintiff’s ex parte motion and the Defendants’ statement of non-

18

opposition, Plaintiff’s RICO claims are dismissed with prejudice, and this case is remanded

19

to state court. See Pham v. Capital Holdings, Case No. 10 CV 971, Dkt. No. 39 at 10

20

(dismissing identical RICO claims with prejudice and contemplating dismissal for lack of

21

jurisdiction). The Clerk is directed to close this case.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 6, 2011

24
25

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge

26
27
28
-1-

11cv1521