Rodriguez v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The Court awards attorney's fees to Denise Bourgeois Haley in the amount of $2,000. Counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff $900, the amount paid by the government under the EAJA. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/20/2014.(rlu)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 SANTIAGO A. RODRIGUEZ Plaintiff, 7 8 9 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 10 Defendant. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:11-CV-1635-BTM-JMA ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff’s counsel, Denise Bourgeois Haley (“Counsel” or “Ms. Haley”), has applied for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The request is based on Ms. Haley’s representation of Plaintiff before this Court pursuant to a contingent-fee agreement. (Doc. 16.) For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion for attorney’s fees. 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Denise Bourgeois Haley of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 22 represented Plaintiff in this case. (Haley Decl. ¶¶1-5, Ex. 1.) In October 2011, this 23 Court remanded the case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the 24 parties’ joint motion, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. Nos. 9, 10). On 25 remand, an Administrative Law Judge found Plaintiff disabled as of February 2, 26 2006, and Plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits of $114,878.92. (Doc. 16-2.) -1- 1 The Court thereafter reopened the case and entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff. 2 (Docs. 12, 13.) 3 On September 30, 2014 the Court granted the parties’ joint motion for an 4 award of attorney fees paid by the government under the Equal Access to Justice 5 Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $900.00 (Doc. No. 18). 6 Counsel now seeks a fee award pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), which 7 permits an award of fees from the benefits received by Plaintiff. In accordance 8 9 10 with the contingent fee agreement, Counsel seeks an order awarding $4,000.00 in fees and requiring her to refund to Plaintiff the $900.00 in EAJA fees previously received by counsel. 11 II. STANDARD 12 13 14 15 16 17 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) provides: Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment . . . . 18 When evaluating a request for a contingent fee under § 406(b), courts must 19 first look to the contingent-fee agreement, then test it for reasonableness. 20 Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The following factors, alone or 21 in combination, may warrant a reduction: (1) the result achieved; (2) “substandard 22 representation”; (3) delay by counsel; and (4) whether “the benefits are large in 23 comparison to the amount of time counsel spent on the case,” thereby resulting in a 24 windfall. Id. at 805; see also Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151-53 (9th Cir. 25 2009). 26 -2- 1 III. DISCUSSION 2 Plaintiff signed a 25% contingent fee agreement, the maximum allowed by 3 406(b). (Doc. 16-1.) In this case, that amounts to $28,719.73. Plaintiff’s counsel 4 seeks a fee of $4,000, 3% of the past due benefits. 5 The Court believes that a reduction of the requested fee is warranted. Plaintiff’s 6 counsel claims that the award is for 6.4 hours counsel expended before the District 7 Court. However, upon examining the time records, it appears that the total time 8 spent on the case before the District Court was 4.6 hours, with 1.5 of the hours 9 billed by the attorney and 3.1 hours billed by a paralegal. This is a case where the 10 benefits awarded, $114,878.92, are very large compared to the minimal amount of 11 time counsel spent on the case. 12 The Court concludes that the windfall created by the disparity between the size 13 of the award and the amount of time counsel spent on the case justifies a reduction 14 of the award by $2,000. Accordingly, the Court awards attorney’s fees in the 15 amount of $2,000. 16 17 IV. DISPOSITION The motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN 18 PART. 19 amount of $2,000. Counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff $900, the amount paid by the 20 government under the EAJA. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court awards attorney’s fees to Denise Bourgeois Haley in the 22 23 24 25 DATED: October 20, 2014 ________________________________ BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?