Gonzalez-Garate v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER Dismissing With Prejudice Petition to Vacate under 28 USC 2255. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 9/15/2011.(mtb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL DE JESUS GONZALEZGARATE, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 16 17 18 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 11-CR-997-L Civil No. 11-CV-2102-L ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 On September 8, 2011, Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Gonzalez-Garate (“Petitioner”) filed a 19 Motion for Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner essentially requests 20 that this Court grant a downward departure of up to two points due to Petitioner’s immigration 21 removal status. The Court has reviewed the record in this case, which clearly establishes that on 22 May 5, 2011, Petitioner waived both his right to appeal and to collaterally attack his conviction 23 and sentence. (Plea Agreement ¶ 11.) Petitioner’s motion raises no challenge to the validity of 24 that waiver, therefore this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider any collateral challenge to his 25 conviction and sentence. See Washington v. Lampert, 422 F.3d 864, 869-70 (9th Cir. 2005) 26 (recognizing that if sentencing agreement’s waiver of the right to file a federal habeas petition 27 was valid, district court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case). 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion For Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2 2255 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: September 15, 2011 6 M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 COPIES TO: 10 PETITIONER U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?