Gomez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 14

ORDER Denying Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Lis Pendens and setting hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is set for hearing on December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Defendants shall fil e an opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction on or before November 18, 2011. Plaintiff shall file her reply on or before November 28, 2011. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/31/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LUZ E GOMEZ, 10 Case No. 11cv2251 BTM(RBB) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND LIS PENDENS AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. 11 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff Luz E. Gomez has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin Defendants from selling her home at a trustee’s sale scheduled for November 3, 2011. Plaintiff also seeks an order for a lis pendens. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. BACKGROUND FACTS On August 27, 2004, Plaintiff and her husband borrowed $339,375.00 from World Savings Bank, FSB. (Request for Judicial Notice in support of Motion to Dismiss (RJN), Ex. A.) The loan was secured by a Deed of Trust on property located at 132 E. Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (the “Property”). (RJN, Ex. B.) The Deed of Trust identifies the “Lender” as “World Savings Bank, FSB, its successors and/or assignees.” (Id.) The Deed of Trust identifies the Trustee as “Golden West Savings Association Service Co.” (Id.) On December 31, 2007, World Savings Bank, FSB changed its name to “Wachovia Mortgage, FSB.” (RJN, Ex. G.). Effective November 1, 2009, Wachovia Mortgage, FSB 1 11cv2251 BTM(RBB) 1 changed its name to “Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A.,” and merged into Wells Fargo 2 Bank, N.A. (RJN, Ex. I.) 3 On December 7, 2009, a Notice of Default was recorded. (RJN, Ex. C.) The Notice 4 of Default was issued by Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, as “either the original 5 trustee, the duly appointed substituted trustee, or acting as agent for the trustee or 6 beneficiary under a deed of trust.” The notice informed Plaintiff and her husband that they 7 were in default in the amount of $8,556.22, and explained that payments should be made 8 to “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., also known as Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo 9 Bank, N.A., and formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as World 10 Savings Bank, FSB.” 11 In a Substitution of Trustee, recorded on April 1, 2011, Wells Fargo (by Cal-Western 12 as Attorney in Fact) substituted Cal-Western as the Trustee. (RJN, Ex. D.) The form was 13 notarized on August 18, 2010, but indicates that the “effective date” is December 3, 2009. 14 On April 14, 2011, a Notice of Trustee’s Sale was recorded. (RJN Ex. E.) The notice, 15 which was signed by Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, set the sale for May 5, 2011. 16 On August 17, 2011, Plaintiff commenced this action in state court. Defendants Wells 17 Fargo Bank, N.A., and Golden West Savings Association Service Co., removed the case to 18 federal court. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and motion to strike, which are set 19 for hearing on December 2, 2011. 20 21 II. STANDARD 22 A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order must 23 establish that (1) he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) he is likely to suffer irreparable 24 harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in his favor; and (4) 25 an injunction is in the public interest. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 26 U.S. 7, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008). 27 The Ninth Circuit has held that the “sliding scale” approach to preliminary injunctions 28 survives Winter when applied as part of the four-element Winter test. Alliance for the Wild 2 11cv2251 BTM(RBB) 1 Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2011). In other words, “‘serious questions 2 going to the merits’ and a balance of hardships that tips sharply towards the plaintiff can 3 support issuance of a preliminary injunction, so long as the plaintiff also shows that there is 4 a likelihood of irreparable injury and that the injunction is in the public interest.” Id. at 1135. 5 6 III. DISCUSSION 7 Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order is premised on Plaintiff’s claim that 8 neither Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), nor Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation 9 (“Cal-Western”), had standing to initiate nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings against the 10 Property. As discussed below, Plaintiff has not shown that this claim has any likelihood of 11 success. 12 Plaintiff argues that because Wells Fargo is not listed in the Note or Deed of Trust, 13 Wells Fargo does not have an interest in the Property and lacks standing to invoke non- 14 judicial foreclosure proceedings. However, it appears that Wells Fargo is a successor to 15 World Savings Bank, FSB. (RJN, Exs. G-I.) Both the Note and Deed of Trust identify the 16 “Lender” as “World Savings Bank, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank, its successors and/or 17 assignees, or anyone to whom this Note is transferred.” (RJN, Exs. A, B.) The Deed of 18 Trust states that the “Lender” is the “Beneficiary.” Thus, it seems that Wells Fargo, as the 19 successor to World Savings Bank, FSB, is the “Lender” and “Beneficiary.” There is no 20 evidence that Wells Fargo is, as Plaintiff claims, “a stranger to the transaction and an 21 intermeddler who has caused false documents to be recorded.” 22 Plaintiff contends that Cal-Western is not actually the Trustee because Cal-Western 23 was not appointed by the Beneficiary – i.e., World Savings Bank, FSB. As already 24 discussed, however, it appears that Wells Fargo was the “Beneficiary” and therefore had the 25 authority to substitute Cal-Western as the Trustee. 26 Plaintiff also argues that the Substitution of Trustee was invalid because it was 27 recorded after the Notice of Default was filed. Plaintiff is correct that the Substitution of 28 Trustee was recorded (and executed) after the filing of the Notice of Default. But even if Cal3 11cv2251 BTM(RBB) 1 Western was not the Trustee at the time of the filing of the Notice of Default, Cal-Western 2 could still file the notice as an authorized agent of Wells Fargo. Under California law, 3 nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings can be instituted by “the trustee, mortgagee, or 4 beneficiary, or any of their authorized agents” by filing a notice of default with the office of 5 the recorder. Cal. Civ. Code § 2924(a)(1). 6 Based on the record before the Court, it appears that Wells Fargo and Cal-Western 7 had standing to initiate non-judicial foreclosure proceedings against the Property. Plaintiff 8 has not demonstrated that she is likely to succeed on her standing claim. Therefore, a 9 temporary restraining order is not warranted. 10 The Court also denies Plaintiff’s motion for a lis pendens. Under California law, a 11 party to an action who asserts a real property claim may record a notice of pendency of 12 action in the office of the recorder of each county in which all or part of the real property is 13 situated. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 405.20. No court order is necessary for Plaintiff to record 14 a notice of lis pendens. 15 IV. CONCLUSION 16 17 For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order 18 and a lis pendens is DENIED. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is set for hearing 19 on December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, there shall be 20 no oral argument, and no personal appearances are necessary. Defendants shall file an 21 opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction on or before November 18, 2011. Plaintiff 22 shall file her reply on or before November 28, 2011. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 DATED: October 31, 2011 26 27 Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge 28 4 11cv2251 BTM(RBB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?