Gomez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
14
ORDER Denying Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Lis Pendens and setting hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is set for hearing on December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Defendants shall fil e an opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction on or before November 18, 2011. Plaintiff shall file her reply on or before November 28, 2011. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/31/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LUZ E GOMEZ,
10
Case No. 11cv2251 BTM(RBB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND LIS PENDENS AND
SETTING HEARING ON MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
v.
11
12
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff Luz E. Gomez has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin
Defendants from selling her home at a trustee’s sale scheduled for November 3, 2011.
Plaintiff also seeks an order for a lis pendens. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s
motion is DENIED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
On August 27, 2004, Plaintiff and her husband borrowed $339,375.00 from World
Savings Bank, FSB. (Request for Judicial Notice in support of Motion to Dismiss (RJN), Ex.
A.) The loan was secured by a Deed of Trust on property located at 132 E. Street, Chula
Vista, CA 91910 (the “Property”). (RJN, Ex. B.) The Deed of Trust identifies the “Lender”
as “World Savings Bank, FSB, its successors and/or assignees.” (Id.) The Deed of Trust
identifies the Trustee as “Golden West Savings Association Service Co.” (Id.)
On December 31, 2007, World Savings Bank, FSB changed its name to “Wachovia
Mortgage, FSB.” (RJN, Ex. G.). Effective November 1, 2009, Wachovia Mortgage, FSB
1
11cv2251 BTM(RBB)
1
changed its name to “Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A.,” and merged into Wells Fargo
2
Bank, N.A. (RJN, Ex. I.)
3
On December 7, 2009, a Notice of Default was recorded. (RJN, Ex. C.) The Notice
4
of Default was issued by Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, as “either the original
5
trustee, the duly appointed substituted trustee, or acting as agent for the trustee or
6
beneficiary under a deed of trust.” The notice informed Plaintiff and her husband that they
7
were in default in the amount of $8,556.22, and explained that payments should be made
8
to “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., also known as Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo
9
Bank, N.A., and formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as World
10
Savings Bank, FSB.”
11
In a Substitution of Trustee, recorded on April 1, 2011, Wells Fargo (by Cal-Western
12
as Attorney in Fact) substituted Cal-Western as the Trustee. (RJN, Ex. D.) The form was
13
notarized on August 18, 2010, but indicates that the “effective date” is December 3, 2009.
14
On April 14, 2011, a Notice of Trustee’s Sale was recorded. (RJN Ex. E.) The notice,
15
which was signed by Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, set the sale for May 5, 2011.
16
On August 17, 2011, Plaintiff commenced this action in state court. Defendants Wells
17
Fargo Bank, N.A., and Golden West Savings Association Service Co., removed the case to
18
federal court. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and motion to strike, which are set
19
for hearing on December 2, 2011.
20
21
II. STANDARD
22
A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order must
23
establish that (1) he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) he is likely to suffer irreparable
24
harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in his favor; and (4)
25
an injunction is in the public interest. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555
26
U.S. 7, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008).
27
The Ninth Circuit has held that the “sliding scale” approach to preliminary injunctions
28
survives Winter when applied as part of the four-element Winter test. Alliance for the Wild
2
11cv2251 BTM(RBB)
1
Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2011). In other words, “‘serious questions
2
going to the merits’ and a balance of hardships that tips sharply towards the plaintiff can
3
support issuance of a preliminary injunction, so long as the plaintiff also shows that there is
4
a likelihood of irreparable injury and that the injunction is in the public interest.” Id. at 1135.
5
6
III. DISCUSSION
7
Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order is premised on Plaintiff’s claim that
8
neither Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), nor Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
9
(“Cal-Western”), had standing to initiate nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings against the
10
Property. As discussed below, Plaintiff has not shown that this claim has any likelihood of
11
success.
12
Plaintiff argues that because Wells Fargo is not listed in the Note or Deed of Trust,
13
Wells Fargo does not have an interest in the Property and lacks standing to invoke non-
14
judicial foreclosure proceedings. However, it appears that Wells Fargo is a successor to
15
World Savings Bank, FSB. (RJN, Exs. G-I.) Both the Note and Deed of Trust identify the
16
“Lender” as “World Savings Bank, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank, its successors and/or
17
assignees, or anyone to whom this Note is transferred.” (RJN, Exs. A, B.) The Deed of
18
Trust states that the “Lender” is the “Beneficiary.” Thus, it seems that Wells Fargo, as the
19
successor to World Savings Bank, FSB, is the “Lender” and “Beneficiary.” There is no
20
evidence that Wells Fargo is, as Plaintiff claims, “a stranger to the transaction and an
21
intermeddler who has caused false documents to be recorded.”
22
Plaintiff contends that Cal-Western is not actually the Trustee because Cal-Western
23
was not appointed by the Beneficiary – i.e., World Savings Bank, FSB.
As already
24
discussed, however, it appears that Wells Fargo was the “Beneficiary” and therefore had the
25
authority to substitute Cal-Western as the Trustee.
26
Plaintiff also argues that the Substitution of Trustee was invalid because it was
27
recorded after the Notice of Default was filed. Plaintiff is correct that the Substitution of
28
Trustee was recorded (and executed) after the filing of the Notice of Default. But even if Cal3
11cv2251 BTM(RBB)
1
Western was not the Trustee at the time of the filing of the Notice of Default, Cal-Western
2
could still file the notice as an authorized agent of Wells Fargo. Under California law,
3
nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings can be instituted by “the trustee, mortgagee, or
4
beneficiary, or any of their authorized agents” by filing a notice of default with the office of
5
the recorder. Cal. Civ. Code § 2924(a)(1).
6
Based on the record before the Court, it appears that Wells Fargo and Cal-Western
7
had standing to initiate non-judicial foreclosure proceedings against the Property. Plaintiff
8
has not demonstrated that she is likely to succeed on her standing claim. Therefore, a
9
temporary restraining order is not warranted.
10
The Court also denies Plaintiff’s motion for a lis pendens. Under California law, a
11
party to an action who asserts a real property claim may record a notice of pendency of
12
action in the office of the recorder of each county in which all or part of the real property is
13
situated. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 405.20. No court order is necessary for Plaintiff to record
14
a notice of lis pendens.
15
IV. CONCLUSION
16
17
For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order
18
and a lis pendens is DENIED. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction is set for hearing
19
on December 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, there shall be
20
no oral argument, and no personal appearances are necessary. Defendants shall file an
21
opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction on or before November 18, 2011. Plaintiff
22
shall file her reply on or before November 28, 2011.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
DATED: October 31, 2011
26
27
Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz
United States District Judge
28
4
11cv2251 BTM(RBB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?