Martinez Contreras v. Reed et al

Filing 7

ORDER: The Court dismisses the case without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, he must, no later than 2/27/2012, file a First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition. If Petitioner wis hes to challenge the conditions of prison life, he must: (1) file a new civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, and (2) either pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank 2241 First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition form, a blank 1983 Civil Complaint form, and a blank Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form also were mailed to Petitioner.) (mdc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN C MARTINEZ CONTRERAS, CASE NO. 11-cv-2732-WQH-BLM 12 Plaintiff, vs. LAWRENCE REED, Warden of C.C.A.; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; ROBIN BAKER, Field Director for I.C.E. San Diego; JANET NAPOLITANO, Head of Homeland Security, ORDER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. HAYES, Judge: On November 18, 2011, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1). On January 18, 2011, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 6). In his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Petitioner claims that his First Amendment rights to free speech and expression, Fifth Amendment rights against double jeopardy and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process are being violated based on his classification as “gang affiliated” by the CCA and his subsequent housing placement at the San Diego Correctional Facility. (ECF No. 1). Petitioner challenges his classification as well as “the procedures that they use here at CCA when housing federal detainees.” Id. at 3. A federal court may only grant a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 if a federal petitioner can demonstrate that he “is in custody in violation of the -1- 11-cv-02732-WQH-BLM 1 Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). A habeas 2 corpus petition is the correct method for a prisoner to challenge “the very fact or duration of 3 his confinement,” and where “the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to 4 immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 5 U.S. 475, 489 (1973). In contrast, a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or Bivens 6 v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) is the proper method for a prisoner to 7 challenge the conditions of his confinement. See McCarthy v. Bronson, 500 U.S. 136, 141-42 8 (1991) (“[A] § 1983 action is a proper remedy for a state prisoner who is making a 9 constitutional challenge to the conditions of his prison life, but not to the fact or length of his 10 custody.”). 11 Upon review of the Petition, the Court concludes that Petitioner is challenging the 12 conditions of his confinement and not the “the fact or length of his custody.” McCarthy, 500 13 U.S. at 142. Petitioner has not stated a cognizable habeas corpus claim pursuant to § 2241. 14 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice and with leave to 15 amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, he must, no 16 later than February 27, 2012, file a First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition. If Petitioner 17 wishes to challenge the conditions of prison life, he must: 18 (1) file a new civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 19 (2) either pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 First Amended 21 Habeas Corpus Petition form, a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Complaint form, a Motion to Proceed 22 In Forma Pauperis form, and a copy of this Order. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 26, 2012 25 26 WILLIAM Q. HAYES United States District Judge 27 28 -2- 11-cv-02732-WQH-BLM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?