Martinez Contreras v. Reed et al
Filing
7
ORDER: The Court dismisses the case without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, he must, no later than 2/27/2012, file a First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition. If Petitioner wis hes to challenge the conditions of prison life, he must: (1) file a new civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, and (2) either pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank 2241 First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition form, a blank 1983 Civil Complaint form, and a blank Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form also were mailed to Petitioner.) (mdc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUAN C MARTINEZ CONTRERAS,
CASE NO. 11-cv-2732-WQH-BLM
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
LAWRENCE REED, Warden of C.C.A.;
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY; ROBIN BAKER, Field
Director for I.C.E. San Diego; JANET
NAPOLITANO, Head of Homeland
Security,
ORDER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
HAYES, Judge:
On November 18, 2011, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1). On January
18, 2011, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 6).
In his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Petitioner claims that his First Amendment
rights to free speech and expression, Fifth Amendment rights against double jeopardy and
Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process are being violated based on his classification as
“gang affiliated” by the CCA and his subsequent housing placement at the San Diego
Correctional Facility. (ECF No. 1). Petitioner challenges his classification as well as “the
procedures that they use here at CCA when housing federal detainees.” Id. at 3.
A federal court may only grant a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 if a federal petitioner can demonstrate that he “is in custody in violation of the
-1-
11-cv-02732-WQH-BLM
1
Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). A habeas
2
corpus petition is the correct method for a prisoner to challenge “the very fact or duration of
3
his confinement,” and where “the relief he seeks is a determination that he is entitled to
4
immediate release or a speedier release from that imprisonment.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411
5
U.S. 475, 489 (1973). In contrast, a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or Bivens
6
v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) is the proper method for a prisoner to
7
challenge the conditions of his confinement. See McCarthy v. Bronson, 500 U.S. 136, 141-42
8
(1991) (“[A] § 1983 action is a proper remedy for a state prisoner who is making a
9
constitutional challenge to the conditions of his prison life, but not to the fact or length of his
10
custody.”).
11
Upon review of the Petition, the Court concludes that Petitioner is challenging the
12
conditions of his confinement and not the “the fact or length of his custody.” McCarthy, 500
13
U.S. at 142. Petitioner has not stated a cognizable habeas corpus claim pursuant to § 2241.
14
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice and with leave to
15
amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, he must, no
16
later than February 27, 2012, file a First Amended Habeas Corpus Petition. If Petitioner
17
wishes to challenge the conditions of prison life, he must:
18
(1) file a new civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and
19
(2) either pay the $350 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
20
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 First Amended
21
Habeas Corpus Petition form, a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Complaint form, a Motion to Proceed
22
In Forma Pauperis form, and a copy of this Order.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 26, 2012
25
26
WILLIAM Q. HAYES
United States District Judge
27
28
-2-
11-cv-02732-WQH-BLM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?